Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics

I’ve been waiting for danah boyd’s aka @zephoria dissertation to be made publicly available since learning that her dissertation had been approved back in December. I’ve followed Dr. boyd’s work for sometime now and would consider her work to be some of the most insightful and pointed research currently happening now on the topic of networked publics. Here is her dissertation as a PDF and here’s her abstract:
“Abstract: As social network sites like MySpace and Facebook emerged, American teenagers began adopting them as spaces to mark identity and socialize with peers. Teens leveraged these sites for a wide array of everyday social practices – gossiping, flirting, joking around, sharing information, and simply hanging out. While social network sites were predominantly used by teens as a peer-based social outlet, the unchartered nature of these sites generated fear among adults. This dissertation documents my 2.5-year ethnographic study of American teens’ engagement with social network sites and the ways in which their participation supported and complicated three practices – self-presentation, peer sociality, and negotiating adult society.
My analysis centers on how social network sites can be understood as networked publics which are simultaneously (1) the space constructed through networked technologies and (2) the imagined community that emerges as a result of the intersection of people, technology, and practice. Networked publics support many of the same practices as unmediated publics, but their structural differences often inflect practices in unique ways. Four properties – persistence, searchability, replicability, and scalability – and three dynamics – invisible audiences, collapsed contexts, and the blurring of public and private – are examined and woven throughout the discussion.
While teenagers primarily leverage social network sites to engage in common practices, the properties of these sites configured their practices and teens were forced to contend with the resultant dynamics. Often, in doing so, they reworked the technology for their purposes. As teenagers learned to navigate social network sites, they developed potent strategies for managing the complexities of and social awkwardness incurred by these sites. Their strategies reveal how new forms of social media are incorporated into everyday life, complicating some practices and reinforcing others. New technologies reshape public life, but teens’ engagement also reconfigures the technology itself.”
Carefully reading this with a highlighter has renewed my mind which has been thoroughly burnt out by the completion of my Masters. Congrats Dr. boyd!
One Comment, Comment or Ping
Raul
Hi James,
Came to your blog (even though I do know you already in person through the Vancouver tech community) through a series of reflections I’ve been having this past week about storytelling. Didn’t get to enjoy your talk at Northern Voice nor at Orality 2.0 but I’d like to chat sometime with you about storytelling.
As I mentioned in my post (where, by the way, I linked to you
) I never thought of myself as someone who was a storyteller, despite the fact that my PhD advisor encouraged me to look at research as telling a story.
As for danah’s work, I’ve always loved her research. I do know that there are a number of other scholars who also study social media, but her work has definitely taken a life of its own. Particularly because she focuses on youth, I think. And as an academic myself, I’m always fascinated by the various ways and methods through which we approach issues of internet and society.
Mar 22nd, 2009
Reply to “Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics”